The ‘fire and fury’ of US President Donald Trump has translated into many memorable phrases that have baffled, amused or infuriated observers. RT looks at the top quotes from the first year of his presidency. January 2017: ‘You are fake news’ Trump had famously sparred with the media throughout his campaign. He reserved his ire […]
Originally posted on Counter Information: By Dr. Joseph Mercola Global Research, March 31, 2021Mercola I’ve discussed why COVID-19 vaccines are in fact gene therapies and not vaccines in several previous articles, including “COVID-19 mRNA Shots Are Legally Not Vaccines,” “COVID-19 ‘Vaccines’ Are Gene Therapy” and “How COVID-19 ‘Vaccines’ May Destroy the Lives of Millions.” However, despite…COVID-19 Vaccines Likened to ‘Software Updates’ for Your Body — The Most Revolutionary Act
Hillary Clinton Declares ‘Shameless’ Republicans Are ‘Gun Worshipers’
30 Mar 20212,6592:20
Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton called Republicans “gun worshipers,” who are “shameless” because of their “huge advantage” due to the filibuster.
“You know, democracy is the balancing of interests and rights, and unfortunately at this time, the gun worshipers have a huge advantage because of the filibuster and because of their shameless exploitation of people’s unwarranted fears,” Hillary Clinton said.
“The opportunists on the other side, like Cruz and his ilk,” she continued, “they know better and they are in the position of trying to keep people really riled up and scared that sensible gun legislation like we had in the ‘90s for 10 years will somehow undermine their rights.”
“Well, what about the rights of all the rest of us? The rights of us to go to work, go shopping, go on dates to the movie theater, go to school, for heaven’s sake — what about the rest of us?” she asked.https://platform.twitter.com/embed/Tweet.html?creatorScreenName=BreitbartNews&dnt=false&embedId=twitter-widget-0&frame=false&hideCard=false&hideThread=false&id=1376901565437644802&lang=en&origin=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.breitbart.com%2Fpolitics%2F2021%2F03%2F30%2Fhillary-clinton-declares-shameless-republicans-are-gun-worshipers%2F&siteScreenName=BreitbartNews&theme=light&widgetsVersion=e1ffbdb%3A1614796141937&width=550px
The House of Representatives has proposed legislation to impose background checks on all gun sales and transfers, but the initiative has not totally satisfied Sen. Jon Tester (D-MT), who is an important vote in a Senate that is split 50/50 with 60 votes needed without the nullification of a filibuster or the tactic of reconciliation to circumvent the Senate Democrat’s vote shortfall.
“Background checks are important. I do believe that. But you can go too far on that ship pretty fast, too. I am for background checks. There is a caveat for handing down within the family and not requiring a background check,” Tester specified.
Even so, Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) said Thursday he would bring up the legislation for a vote when the Senate returns April 12.
The full interview of Hillary Clinton will be released Thursday.
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez: Joe Biden’s $2 Trillion Infrastructure Plan ‘Needs to Be Way Bigger’
HANNAH BLEAU31 Mar 20212,6092:14
President Joe Biden’s $2 trillion infrastructure plan, dubbed the American Jobs Plan, is not sufficient and “needs to be way bigger,” Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) said on Tuesday prior to the proposal’s formal unveiling.
Biden is outlining his $2 trillion plan on Wednesday, which devotes roughly $174 billion to the electric vehicle market, $115 billion to modernize bridges, highways, and roads, $50 billion in semiconductor manufacturing and research, $25 billion in airports, $10 billion investment in enforcement to “ensure employers are providing workers with good jobs,” $10 billion investment for Civilian Climate Corps, and more, as Breitbart News highlighted.
Ocasio-Cortez, however, does not believe it is sufficient, as the $2 trillion proposal spreads out over the next decade.
“This is not nearly enough. The important context here is that it’s $2.25T spread out over 10 years,” she said. “For context, the COVID package was $1.9T for this year *alone,* with some provisions lasting 2 years.”
“Needs to be way bigger,” the New York lawmaker added:
Biden is expected to formally outline the proposal in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania sometime Wednesday afternoon. The measure, if passed, would increase the corporate tax rate from 21 percent to 28 percent, soaring over the 25 percent corporate tax rate of Communist China.
Republicans do not appear to be on board with Biden’s economic proposal, particularly as the economy continues to recover from the battering it took during the Chinese coronavirus pandemic last year.
“No president has ever raised business taxes to recover from an economic crisis,” Rep. Kevin Brady (R-TX), Ranking Member of the House Ways and Means Committee, said. “This couldn’t come at a worse time.”
Investigation of Acute Non-viral Hepatitis Illnesses – “Real Water” Brand Alkaline Water (March 2021)
Do not drink, cook with, sell, or serve “Real Water” alkaline water
The FDA, along with the CDC and the Southern Nevada Health District, is investigating a number of reports of acute non-viral hepatitis in the state of Nevada associated with “Real Water” brand alkaline water.
On March 25, 2020, in addition to the information reported in the firm’s recall, FDA learned that that 3- and 5-gallon containers of Real Water brand drinking water were distributed in the state of Utah.
Given a lack of cooperation by the firm, FDA investigators have been unable to complete investigations at the “Real Water” Inc. facilities in Henderson, NV and Mesa, AZ and have not been provided with requested records. As a result, on March 23 and on March 25, FDA issued a Demand for Records under section 414 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act.
Consumption of “Real Water” brand alkaline water is the only common link identified among all of these cases to date. This brand of alkaline water is owned by Real Water Inc., headquartered in Mesa, Arizona.
Although the investigation is ongoing, current epidemiologic information indicates that this alkaline water product may be the cause of the illnesses.
As this outbreak investigation continues, the FDA will provide additional updates to this advisory as more information becomes available.
Consumers, restaurants, and retailers should not drink, cook with, sell, or serve “Real Water” alkaline water, until more information is known about the cause of the illnesses. Further, FDA advises that this water not be served to pets. These products include but are not limited to: 5-gallon and 3-gallon containers (sold through home delivery/subscription), bottles of various sizes (sold on-line and in stores), and the “Real Water” concentrate (sold on-line).
According to the firm’s press release, the recalled alkaline water products are available nationwide, however the 5-gallon containers were distributed to the following areas: greater Las Vegas, NV area, central California coastal region (North of Los Angeles, CA, and South from Santa Barbara, CA), and Phoenix, AZ.
The firm’s press release also includes 1.5 liter, 1 liter, 500 ml and 1 gallon ready-to-drink alkaline water bottles and the 4 oz. concentrate.
Symptoms of all types of hepatitis, including non-viral hepatitis, are similar and can include fever, fatigue, loss of appetite, nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, dark urine, clay or gray-colored bowel movements, joint pain, yellow eyes, and jaundice. Those experiencing these symptoms should contact their doctor.
Total Illnesses: 5
Last Illness Onset Date: 11/29/2020
States with Cases: NV (5)
Press release: -Systematic shafts uncovered / -German slaughterhouse tortures animals to death / -North Rhine-Westphalia authorities fail to protect animals SOKO animal welfare investigators can use current images from the last few weeks to prove that animals were systematically slaughtered in full consciousness at the Prott meat center in Selm North Rhine-Westphalia (NRW) on every […]This is how meat production works in Germany — World Animals Voice
Plummeting Sperm Counts, Shrinking Penises: Toxic Chemicals Threaten Humanity
In her new book, “Countdown,” environmental and reproductive epidemiologist Shanna Swan predicts sperm counts could reach zero by 2045 thanks to hormone-disrupting chemicals that are “everywhere.”By
A new book called “Countdown,” by Shanna Swan, an environmental and reproductive epidemiologist at Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai in New York, finds that sperm counts have dropped almost 60% since 1973.
Following the trajectory we are on, Swan’s research suggests sperm counts could reach zero by 2045. Zero. Let that sink in. That would mean no babies. No reproduction. No more humans. Forgive me for asking: why isn’t the UN calling an emergency meeting on this right now?
The chemicals to blame for this crisis are found in everything from plastic containers and food wrapping, to waterproof clothes and fragrances in cleaning products, to soaps and shampoos, to electronics and carpeting. Some of them, called PFAS, are known as “forever chemicals,” because they don’t break down in the environment or the human body. They just accumulate and accumulate — doing more and more damage, minute by minute, hour by hour, day by day. Now, it seems, humanity is reaching a breaking point.
Swan’s book is staggering in its findings. “In some parts of the world, the average twenty-something woman today is less fertile than her grandmother was at 35,” Swan writes. In addition to that, Swan finds that, on average, a man today will have half of the sperm his grandfather had. “The current state of reproductive affairs can’t continue much longer without threatening human survival,” writes Swan, adding: “It’s a global existential crisis.” That’s not hyperbole. That’s just science.
As if this wasn’t terrifying enough, Swan’s research finds that these chemicals aren’t just dramatically reducing semen quality, they are also shrinking penis size and volume of the testes. This is nothing short of a full-scale emergency for humanity.
Swan’s book echoes previous research, which has found that PFAS harms sperm production, disrupts the male hormone and is correlated to a “reduction of semen quality, testicular volume and penile length”. These chemicals are literally confusing our bodies, making them send mixed messages and go haywire.
Given everything we know about these chemicals, why isn’t more being done? Right now, there is a paltry patchwork of inadequate legislation responding to this threat. Laws and regulations vary from country to country, region to region, and, in the United States, state to state. The European Union, for example, has restricted several phthalates in toys and sets limits on phthalates considered “reprotoxic” — meaning they harm the human reproductive capacities — in food production.
In the U.S., a scientific study found phthalate exposure “widespread” in infants, and that the chemicals were found in the urine of babies who came into contact with baby shampoos, lotions and powders. Still, aggressive regulation is lacking, not least because of lobbying by chemical industry giants.
In the state of Washington, lawmakers managed to pass the Pollution Prevention for Our Future Act, which “directs state agencies to address classes of chemicals and moves away from a chemical by chemical approach, which has historically resulted in companies switching to equally bad or worse substitutes. The first chemical classes to be addressed in products include phthalates, PFAS, PCBs, alkylphenol ethoxylate and bisphenol compounds, and organohalogen flame retardants.” The state has taken important steps to address the extent of chemical pollution, but by and large, the U.S., like many other countries, is fighting a losing battle because of weak, inadequate legislation.
In the U.S. today, for example, you can’t eat the deer meat caught in Oscoda, Michigan, as the health department there issued a “do not eat” advisory for deer caught near the former air force base because of staggeringly high PFOS levels in the muscle of one deer.
And, just the other week, hundreds of residents who live near Luke Air Force Base in Arizona were advised not to drink their water when tests detected high levels of toxic chemicals. Scientists have found these substances in the blood of nearly all the people they tested in the U.S. No country or region on earth is untouched by PFAS contamination. It is a global problem. PFAS has been found in every corner of the globe. It is virtually present in the bodies of every human. It’s found in fish deep in the sea, and birds flying high in the sky.
And it’s killing us, literally, by harming and attacking the very source of life: our reproductive capacities. The rapid death and decline of sperm must be addressed, and it must be addressed now. There simply is no time to lose.
Originally published by The Guardian.
The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Children’s Health Defense.
Comment by Jim Campbell February 27th, 2020 Be clear, Obama was never a U.S. President he was the Manchurian Candidate, who with a great deal of help managed pull off an amazing charade. If the reader believes otherwise they haven’t done any independent research. Why did they allegedly send SEAL TEAM 6 to kill him. […]Meet the New President of the United States….Barack Obama — Jim Campbell’s
Lockdowns Improving Cities
Propaganda Crash: World Economic Forum Tweets “Lockdowns Improving Cities”, Then Deletes Admitting It Was Wrong
by Tyler DurdenSaturday, Feb 27, 2021 – 18:16
If there was any doubt that economic lockdowns supposedly inspired by the Covid pandemic are the peak in globalist propaganda, it disappeared not so “quietly” once and for all at 5:48am ET on Saturday, when the globalist organization which recently unleashed such lunatics as Klaus Schwab, best known for revealing the endgame with his book COVID-19: The Great Reset, deleted a that “Lockdowns are quietly improving cities around the world.”
Remarkably, the WEF’s propaganda tweet – which was was accompanied by a video showing deserted streets and silent factories, that noted a record drop in carbon emissions and linked to an article claiming that silent cities contributed to better detection of minor earthquakes (because millions of workers losing their jobs is clearly less important than being able to measure the next M2 quake to the 8th significant digit) – survived just a few hours following a barrage of mockery and outraged comments.
Just before 6am ET on Saturday, the WEF finally deleted the tweet, admitting in a subsequent highly ratioed tweet that “lockdowns aren’t “quietly improving cities” around the world” despite still insisting that the restrictions have been “an important part of the public health response to Covid-19.”
By this point, however, social media was in a full blown frenzy over the WEF’s admission that covid lockdowns are just peak propaganda – one which has the complicit participation of all Silicon Valley tech giants – and sparked en even louder response from an outraged non-Davos audience.
A group quickly swarmed on the corrected tweet, claiming correctly that the actual effect of lockdowns on halting the spread of the coronavirus remains a highly debated issue.
World Economic Forum@wef·We’re deleting this tweet. Lockdowns aren’t “quietly improving cities” around the world. But they are an important part of the public health response to COVID-19.cynicalcactus@cynicalcactus1Replying to @wefNow that’s 2 tweets you should delete. Lockdowns are inhuman and cause massive collateral damage to lives and livelihoods far beyond any “good” they do. They are straight from the CCP playbook.
The concession message looked like the WEF was actually “doubling down on [its] idiocy” instead of trying to do some damage control, former British MEP Martin Daubney
At the same time, the peasants demonstrated remarkable insight accusing the WEF of being “the hidden enemy of the people, worldwide. The unelected force that look to dominate our lives by influencing Governments all over the globe. It needs shutting down
Some were furious that the propaganda arm of globalists had a “RIGHT TO RULE and DECIDE WHAT IS FAIR, EQUITABLE and REASONABLE” and warned that the crowd was coming for the WEF
Others quickly saw through the propaganda flip-flopping, and straight to the heart of the WEF’s agenda, one of spreading “global socialism” which will make lives for billions of people a nightmare which making a handful of virtue signaling uber-globalists (who arrive in Davos on their private jets even as they parade with how green they are) richer than ever
Yet others had even more direct suggestions for the WEF
At the end, the catastrophic gaffe left a huge dent on what little was left of the the globalist group’s reputation, and many users argued that it should just shut up
But most importantly, the tweet confirmed once again that what until now was a “conspiracy theory” pursued with rabid fervor by such tech giants as Google, Amazon and Twitter, was fact
Hours later, as the WEF’s catastrophic fiasco spread virally across the world, the WEF decided to triple down on its peak idiocy, and instead of just forgetting all about the matter decided that it’s best to engage with random twitter economists, and blame it all on “a working human being who made a mistake.”
After a whistleblower complained that Coca-Cola was asking its employees to engage in diversity training offered by LinkedIn Education that encouraged them to “try to be less white,” the social media firm has removed the program. © Gary Hershorn/Getty A Coca-Cola sign hangs over a vending machine at the Woodbury Common Premium Outlets shopping mall on November 24, 2020 in Central Valley, New York.
“The Confronting Racism course featuring Robin DiAngelo is no longer available in our course library, at the request of the 3rd party content provider we licensed this content from,” LinkedIn vice president of corporate communications Nicole Leverich told Newsweek in an email on Monday. https://products.gobankingrates.com/r/e48f149e71a19f66115d5f5c8edaefd8?subid=
“We provide a wide variety of learning content, including more than 270 courses on the topics of diversity, inclusion and belonging,” Leverich said. “We will continue to add new courses to help people learn the skills they need to be more successful in their career, including the foundational skills we all need to be effective allies and help build a more equitable future.”
Coca-Cola has been criticized on social media since Friday when Karlyn Borysenko, who is an organizational psychologist and YouTube commentator, tweeted screenshots of the LinkedIn course.
Borysenko received the tip from whistleblowers at Coca-Cola who said employees were “required” to take the online course, though other companies were similarly asking their staff to engage in the course, as well.
“The real story is that Coca-Cola is one of probably thousands of companies that are having their employees do these courses,” Borysenko told Newsweek. “Why did LinkedIn produce content asking people to be less white? Why are they still hosting this? Coca-Cola is a drop in the bucket.”
Late Monday, LinkedIn said the course is no longer on its platform. LinkedIn did not say how many companies were using the lesson or how many times the controversial video had been viewed.
In four days, Borysenko’s tweet had been viewed by 23 million people while a follow-up YouTube video had more than 100,000 views.
The now-removed Confronting Racism course included a slide that instructed students to be “less white, less arrogant, less certain, less defensive, less ignorant and more humble.”
The lesson also informed viewers that “in the U.S. and other Western nations, white people are socialized to feel that they are inherently superior because they are white,” and it cites vague “research” claiming that children as young as 3 “understand that it is better to be white.”
While Coca-Cola told Newsweek that the lesson wasn’t mandatory for employees, Borysenko said multiple employees at the company say that it indeed had been—at least until Friday, and at least one employee provided her an email she says backs up the assertion.
“I can understand sometimes there’s miscommunication between management and employees … but the messaging I’ve seen does use the word ‘required.’ Everything I’ve seen says it was part of the coursework, but then it was removed over the weekend once the news broke,” Borysenko told Newsweek.
Coca-Cola told Newsweek that the video and images “are not part of the company’s learning curriculum.” Coca-Cola said it has a “Better Together” training initiative that includes access to the LinkedIn diversity lesson but that it “was not part of the company’s curriculum. We will continue to listen to our employees and refine our learning programs as appropriate.”
- Coca-Cola, Facing Backlash, Says ‘Be Less White’ Learning Plan Was About Workplace Inclusion
- Mitch McConnell Attacks COVID Stimulus Joe Biden Hoped Would Be Bipartisan
- Lindsey Graham Predicts Donald Trump Will Lead the GOP in Next Couple of Months
FROM: privacy <firstname.lastname@example.org>
SUBJECT: DOG COLLARS FOR PEOPLE…
DATE: February 25, 2021 08:58:10 AM PST
TO: undisclosed-recipients: ;
$2.5M invested in bracelets that beep if you come within 6 feet of someone –
SOCIAL DISTANCING. WHO THE FUCK CAME UP WITH THAT TERM IF NOT A
PROPAGANDA SPECIALIST, LIKE AN ATTORNEY FOR EXAMPLE OR GOVERNMENT
WELL GUESS WHAT FOLKS, THAT TERM IS THE ANTITHESIS OF WHAT THE 4TH
AMENDMENT AND THE STATE CONSTITUTIONAL COUNTER PARTS PROTECT & SECURE!!!
WHAT DOES “AUTONOMY” MEAN???
THE FOLLOWING IS FROM A STANFORD LAW REVIEW ARTICLE, VOL. 25, JUNE
1973, “NONARREST AUTOMOBILE STOPS: UNCONSTITUTIONAL SEIZURES OF THE
PERSON” BY CARL R. SCHENKER, JR.:
B. INDIVIDUAL INTERESTS
THE STATE INTERESTS IN INVESTIGATIVE AND INSPECTION STOPS MUST BE
BALANCED AGAINST THE INDIVIDUAL INTERESTS AT STAKE IN AN AUTOMOBILE
STOP. ANALYSIS OF FOURTH AMENDMENT CASE LAW SUGGESTS THAT AUTOMOBILE
STOPS MAY IMPINGE ON AT LEAST FIVE OF AN INDIVIDUAL’S SEIZURE-RELATED
FOURTH AMENDMENT INTERESTS.
I. FREEDOM FROM ARBITRARY STATE INTERFERENCE.
A MOTORIST HAS A FOURTH AMENDMENT INTEREST IN BEING FREE FROM
ARBITRARY STATE INTERFERENCES,” AS DO NONMOTORISTS.55 ORDINARILY THIS
PROTECTION IS AFFORDED BY REQUIRING THAT AN “OBJECTIVE EVIDENTIARY
JUSTIFICATION””‘ SINGLE OUT AN INDIVIDUAL FOR SEIZURE.” HOWEVER, IN
SOME CIRCUMSTANCES PROTECTION FROM ARBITRARY INTERFERENCE MAY BE
AFFORDED IF AN OFFICER WHO CAN DEMONSTRATE THAT HIS ACTION IS LEGALLY
AUTHORIZED SEIZES MEMBERS OF A CLASS ON A REGULARIZED BASIS.”‘ A
MOTORIST’S INTEREST IN FREEDOM FROM ARBITRARY STATE INTERFERENCES WILL
BE VIOLATED WHEN HE IS SEIZED IN CIRCUMSTANCES WHICH PROVIDE NEITHER
OF THESE GUARANTEES AGAINST ABUSE OF POLICEMEN’S SEIZURE POWERS.
2. “AUTONOMOUS SELF-POSITIONING.”
AN AUTOMOBILE STOP IMPINGES UPON AN INDIVIDUAL’S INTEREST IN MAKING
AUTONOMOUS DECISIONS TO REMAIN WHERE HE IS OR TO GO ELSEWHERE.” TERRY
HELD THAT WHENEVER AN INDIVIDUAL HAS BEEN DEPRIVED OF THIS AUTONOMY HE
HAS BEEN SEIZED.” OBVIOUSLY, THIS INTEREST IS AS STRONG FOR A
STATIONARY INDIVIDUAL AS FOR THE OCCUPANT OF A MOVING CAR.
3. FREE PASSAGE.
A MOVING INDIVIDUAL HAS A FURTHER INTEREST IN LIBERTY OF MOVEMENT
WHICH A STATIONARY INDIVIDUAL DOES NOT HAVE-THE INTEREST IN BEING ABLE
TO CONTINUE HIS MOVEMENT. THE SUPREME COURT RECOGNIZED THIS INTEREST
IN “FREE PASSAGE WITHOUT INTERRUPTION” IN CARROLL V. UNITED STATES.”
CARROLL AROSE IN THE CONTEXT OF THE STOPPING OF AN AUTOMOBILE TO ALLOW
A SEARCH,”‘ BUT IT HAS ALSO BEEN CITED BY THE COURT IN DISCUSSING
STOPS TO ALLOW SEIZURES.”‘
CLEARLY ANY MOVING INDIVIDUAL HAS AN INTEREST IN FREE PASSAGE, BUT A
MOTORIST’S INTEREST IS ESPECIALLY STRONG. FIRST, AN INDIVIDUAL
UTILIZES A CAR SPECIFICALLY TO ENHANCE HIS PERSONAL MOBILITY. IN
ADDITION, WHILE ANYONE CAN INTERRUPT THE MOVEMENT OF A SLOWLY MOVING
INDIVIDUAL-FOR EXAMPLE, A PEDESTRIAN – ORDINARILY ONLY A POLICEMAN CAN
STOP A MOTORIST.”‘ THUS, AS A PRACTICAL MATTER, THE OCCUPANT OF A
MOVING CAR HAS GREATER EXPECTATIONS OF ACHIEVING FREE PASSAGE. THESE
EXPECTATIONS HAVE CONSTITUTIONAL SIGNIFICANCE BECAUSE FOURTH AMENDMENT
JURISPRUDENCE HOLDS THAT REASONABLE EXPECTATIONS OF FREEDOM FROM
GOVERNMENT INTERFERENCE PLAY A ROLE IN THE DELINEATION OF FOURTH
4. “AUTONOMOUS OTHER-ENCOUNTERING.”
AUTOMOBILE STOPS ALSO IMPINGE UPON AN INDIVIDUAL’S INTEREST IN
AVOIDING THOSE WHOM HE DOES NOT WISH TO ENCOUNTER.” ALTHOUGH CLOSELY
RELATED TO AND OFTEN REALIZED BY EXERCISE OF AUTONOMOUS
SELF-POSITIONING, THIS INTEREST HAS DISTINCT CONTENT. THE DISTINCTION
IS OBSCURED BY THE FACT THAT A POLICEMAN CAN ORDINARILY ENCOUNTER A
MOTORIST ONLY BY INTERFERING WITH HIS AUTONOMOUS SELF-POSITIONING AND
FREEDOM OF PASSAGE. THE DISTINCT CONTENT OF THIS INTEREST MAY BE SEEN,
HOWEVER, IN THE FACT THAT A POLICEMAN CAN ENCOUNTER A STATIONARY
INDIVIDUAL WITHOUT INTERFERING WITH HIS AUTONOMOUS SELF-POSITIONING.”
THE INTEREST IN AUTONOMOUS OTHER-ENCOUNTERING EXISTS FOR BOTH
STATIONARY AND MOVING INDIVIDUALS, BUT IT IS ESPECIALLY STRONG FOR A
MOTORIST BECAUSE HE CAN ALMOST ENTIRELY AVOID UNDESIRED ENCOUNTERS
WITH INDIVIDUALS OTHER THAN POLICEMEN.
5. PRIVACY RIGHTS.
FINALLY, THE OCCUPANT OF A MOVING AUTOMOBILE HAS SPECIAL FOURTH
AMENDMENT PRIVACY INTERESTS WHICH STEM FROM THE OPERATION OF FOURTH
AMENDMENT SEARCH LAW. CASE LAW HOLDS THAT PLAIN SIGHT OBSERVATIONS BY
POLICEMEN ARE NOT SEARCHES,”‘ AND THAT A POLICEMAN WHO IS JUSTIFIABLY
IN A POSITION TO OBSERVE INCRIMINATING EVIDENCE IN PLAIN SIGHT” MAY
ARREST ON THAT BASIS.” THUS A POLICEMAN WHO LAWFULLY” APPROACHES A
VEHICLE MAY ARREST ITS OCCUPANT IF HE OBSERVES ILLEGAL ACTIVITY OR
ILLEGAL OBJECTS IN PLAIN SIGHT.” ON THE OTHER HAND, SEARCH LAW GOVERNS
A POLICEMAN IN SEARCHING FOR OBJECTS NOT VISIBLE FROM OUTSIDE THE CAR.
SO FUCK “SOCIAL DISTANCING”, I HAVE CLEARLY ESTABLISHED CONSTITUTIONALLY
SECURED UNALIENABLE RIGHTS AND THAT’S NOT ONE OF EM!
I CAN’T HELP BUT WONDER WHERE ALL THE PEOPLE ARE WHO I SENT THAT LAW
REVIEW ARTICLE TO OVER THE PAST 20+ YEARS SINCE RICHARD MCDONALD
PROVIDED IT TO ME.
The first step in solving a problem is recognizing there is one.
If they can get you asking the wrong questions, they don’t have to worry about answers.